@comment{{ Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use https://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. If you have questions or need assistance using JSTOR, please contact JSTOR Support (https://www.jstor.org/action/showContactSupportForm) and let us know how we can help you. }}
@comment{{NUMBER OF CITATIONS : 1}}

@article{rand1990,
	jstor_articletype = {research-article},
	title = {Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth},
	author = {Jorgenson, Dale W. and Wilcoxen, Peter J.},
	journal = {The RAND Journal of Economics},
	jstor_issuetitle = {},
	volume = {21},
	number = {2},
	jstor_formatteddate = {Summer, 1990},
	pages = {pp. 314-340},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2555426},
	ISSN = {07416261},
	abstract = {In this article we quantify the costs of pollution controls by reporting the results of simulations of the growth of the U.S. economy with and without regulation. For this purpose, we have constructed a detailed model of the economy that includes the determinants of long-term growth. We have also analyzed the interaction between industries in order to capture the full repercussions of environmental regulations. However, we have not attempted to assess the benefits resulting from a cleaner environment. We find that pollution abatement has emerged as a major claimant on the resources of the U.S. economy. The cost of emission controls is more than 10% of the total cost of government purchases of goods and services.},
	language = {English},
	year = {1990},
	publisher = {Wiley on behalf of RAND Corporation},
	copyright = {Copyright © 1990 RAND Corporation},
}


@comment{{ These records have been provided through JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org }}







@comment{{ Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use https://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. If you have questions or need assistance using JSTOR, please contact JSTOR Support (https://www.jstor.org/action/showContactSupportForm) and let us know how we can help you. }}
@comment{{NUMBER OF CITATIONS : 1}}

@article{joel1995,
	jstor_articletype = {research-article},
	title = {Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?},
	author = {Jaffe, Adam B. and Peterson, Steven R. and Portney, Paul R. and Stavins, Robert N.},
	journal = {Journal of Economic Literature},
	jstor_issuetitle = {},
	volume = {33},
	number = {1},
	jstor_formatteddate = {Mar., 1995},
	pages = {pp. 132-163},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2728912},
	ISSN = {00220515},
	abstract = {},
	language = {English},
	year = {1995},
	publisher = {American Economic Association},
	copyright = {Copyright © 1995 American Economic Association},
}


@comment{{ These records have been provided through JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org }}

@comment{{ Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use https://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. If you have questions or need assistance using JSTOR, please contact JSTOR Support (https://www.jstor.org/action/showContactSupportForm) and let us know how we can help you. }}
@comment{{NUMBER OF CITATIONS : 1}}

@article{1990,
	jstor_articletype = {research-article},
	title = {Steel and the State: Industry Politics and Business Policy Formation, 1940-1989},
	author = {Harland Prechel},
	journal = {American Sociological Review},
	jstor_issuetitle = {},
	volume = {55},
	number = {5},
	jstor_formatteddate = {Oct., 1990},
	pages = {pp. 648-668},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095862},
	ISSN = {00031224},
	abstract = {Whether states are autonomous and whether unity exists within the capitalist class are questions that have long been debated by political and historical sociologists. I suggest that these questions are historically contingent, and conceptualize the state as an organization that is affected by its own structure and agendas, and by the political coalitions in its environment. I evaluate competing explanations of state business policy formation by examining policies that affected the U.S. steel industry between 1940 and 1989. There are four major findings: (1) organizations that represent political coalitions of capitalist groups in the state's environment form the basis of collective action and constitute the means to exercise political and economic power; (2) differential rates of accumulation affect business unity; (3) business policy is affected by the state's structure and agendas and the way in which its agendas conflict or coincide with the interests of the steel industry; (4) as the state's authority extends over more areas of economic activity and as it establishes more complex enforcement structures, state autonomy declines because these new structures provide class segments with legitimate mechanisms within which class members can exercise their political power.},
	language = {English},
	year = {1990},
	publisher = {American Sociological Association},
	copyright = {Copyright © 1990 American Sociological Association},
}


@comment{{ These records have been provided through JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org }}